DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
mht aA 4 e hoU4F wat areannre army o2nNr
his ig in reference to your app-
naval record pursuant to the
a
three-membe
Weld
SLCLING
er
eat
lagqzat’
Es... Le
requ agTaLTLOMs Of erro
tae HAPArAanee
n accordance
DUT s Amer
vor
your
@
e;
for three
missing s mov
r t
Additionally, you were counseled and warned on t occasions that
further misconduct could result in administra
e diechar
VE QALSCilealr
due to a pattern o!
your procedural rights, your
authority recommen that y
ble (OTH) discharge due E
the separation authori concurred
by reason of misconduct. You
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your record of service, post service accomplishments, and desire
to upgrade your discharge. Nevertheless, based on the
information currently contained in your record, the Board
concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant
vecharacterization of your discharage given your three NJPs, and
fact that you were warned of the consequences of furtner
misconduct. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerel
ROBER - *)' NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4143 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2015. Additionally, you were counseled and warned after your first NJP, that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01322 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 19 October 1990, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07431-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your applicant, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful nd conscientious consideration of the entire record, the B rd found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish t e existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 19 June 1981 after three years of honorable ser ce. On 21 March 1985 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03345-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01244-04
Documentary the material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was ±ris~if I iCi N1t. On 8 June 1981 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a five-day period of unauthorized absence (UA) and were awarded forfeitures of pay, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05948-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were so discharged on 3 July 1984.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00788-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures ,applicable to the proceedings of this Board. dereliction in the performance of your duties and were awarded a $300 forfeiture of pay and reduction t paygrade E-l. Again, you were warned that further misconduct could result in an other than honorable discharge. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06278-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2003. The letter of 27 March 1986 that notified you that the request was denied stated that your "statements clearly demonstrate that your request for discharge (was) based on dissatisfaction with the naval service and not by reason of conscientious objector beliefs." Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04313-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. records.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00675-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your general discharge given your record of...